Why These Disputes Are Treated Seriously
Consumer commissions have recognised that services tied to a one-time, irreplaceable event (a wedding, a function, a ceremony) cause a distinct kind of harm when they fail — there is no possibility of the service being performed again to cure the deficiency. A vendor's non-performance or seriously substandard performance for such an event is measured not only by the monetary loss (deposit, advance) but also the disruption and distress caused, which the Commission may take into account within the relief it considers appropriate on the facts.
Common Grievances
- No-show / last-minute cancellation: The vendor (caterer, photographer, decorator, band) fails to show up or cancels shortly before the event.
- Materially inferior delivery: Food quality, decoration, photography/videography, or venue setup significantly below what was agreed and paid for.
- Venue double-booking: A venue confirmed and paid for is found double-booked or unavailable close to the event date.
- Deposit/advance not refunded: Advance paid for a cancelled or undelivered service not refunded despite the vendor's own cancellation policy.
- Hidden charges at settlement: Final bill materially higher than the agreed package price, for items not disclosed as extra at booking.
Applicable Law
An event vendor providing services for consideration is a "service" provider under Section 2(42), CPA 2019, and the client is a "consumer" under Section 2(7). Non-performance, a no-show, or materially substandard delivery is "deficiency" under Section 2(11); a misleading representation of what the package included, or hidden charges not disclosed at booking, is "unfair trade practice" under Section 2(47). A written contract, quotation, or booking confirmation specifying the agreed scope, date, and price is central evidence of what was promised.
Jurisdiction & Forum
| Forum | Pecuniary jurisdiction | Location |
|---|---|---|
| DCDRC Puducherry | Value of goods/services paid as consideration up to ₹50 Lakh | Lawspet, Puducherry |
| SCDRC Puducherry | ₹50 Lakh to ₹2 Crore; also first appeals from DCDRC orders | Lawspet, Puducherry |
| NCDRC | Above ₹2 Crore; also first appeals from SCDRC orders | New Delhi |
(Section 34(1)/47(1)(a)(i)/58(1)(a)(i) of the Act itself set these thresholds at ₹1 Crore / ₹10 Crore / above ₹10 Crore; each carries a proviso letting the Central Government prescribe a different value. Exercising that power, the Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission) Rules, 2021 currently set the values shown in the table above.) Most event-service complaints fall within DCDRC Puducherry's jurisdiction by value; a Puducherry client may generally file there under Section 34(2).
Limitation Period
Under Section 69, CPA 2019, a complaint must ordinarily be filed within two years from the date the cause of action arose — generally the date of the event itself, or the date the vendor's refusal to refund/settle was received.
Documents Typically Needed
- Written contract/quotation/booking confirmation stating the agreed scope, date, and price
- Payment receipts for all advances/instalments paid
- Photographs/video of the event showing the actual delivery, where quality is disputed
- WhatsApp/email correspondence with the vendor before, during, and after the event
- Witness statements, where relevant (e.g. from other attendees regarding a no-show or poor delivery)
- The final bill, if hidden/undisclosed charges are disputed
General Process Outline
- Step 1 — Document at the time: Record the failure (photographs, written complaint to the vendor) as close to the event as possible.
- Step 2 — Written complaint: Raise the grievance in writing with the vendor and request a refund/resolution per their own cancellation/service terms.
- Step 3 — Legal notice: A written notice to the vendor setting out the grievance and relief sought.
- Step 4 — File the complaint: Under Section 35, with supporting documents, at DCDRC Puducherry, online via e-jagriti.gov.in or in person; it is heard on the basis of an affidavit and documentary evidence (Section 38(6)).
- Step 5 — Admission and hearing: Per Section 36 (admission, ordinarily within 21 days of filing) and Section 38 (notice to the opposite party within 21 days of admission; response within 30 days, extendable by 15 days), then hearing and evidence.
- Step 6 — Order: Under Section 39, the Commission may direct relief it considers appropriate on the facts proved — refund of amounts paid, or compensation; the Act does not fix or guarantee any specific outcome.