✈️ Travel — Flights & Hotels

Flight & Hotel Booking Consumer Complaint Puducherry

Flight cancellation, denied boarding due to overbooking, or a hotel booking not honoured as confirmed, are governed by specific compensation rules (for domestic flights, DGCA's Civil Aviation Requirements) alongside the general consumer law framework — and, where booked through an online travel agent, the E-Commerce Rules also apply. This page sets out that framework, the forum to approach, the limitation period, and the process. It is published for general information only and is not legal advice.

Flights — DGCA Compensation Rules (Domestic)

Under DGCA's Civil Aviation Requirements on "Refund of Airfare, Facilities for Air Passengers," and the applicable guidelines on denied boarding and cancellation:

Hotel Bookings

A hotel refusing to honour a confirmed booking ("walked" to another property without consent), providing a room materially different from what was booked/paid for, or an online travel agent (OTA) failing to process a valid cancellation/refund per its own displayed policy, is a deficiency in service. Where booked through an OTA, the OTA (as an e-commerce entity) must also comply with the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 — a Grievance Officer who acknowledges within 48 hours and resolves within 1 month, accurate disclosure of the hotel's cancellation policy before booking, and no manipulation of pricing/availability displays.

Applicable Law

The airline/hotel/OTA provides a "service" for consideration under Section 2(42), CPA 2019, and the traveller is a "consumer" under Section 2(7). A cancellation, denied boarding, or booking dishonoured without adequate cause is "deficiency" under Section 2(11); a misleading cancellation-policy display or hidden fee is "unfair trade practice" under Section 2(47). Both the OTA (for its own platform conduct) and the airline/hotel (for the underlying service) can be relevant opposite parties, depending on where the failure occurred.

Jurisdiction & Forum

ForumPecuniary jurisdictionLocation
DCDRC PuducherryValue of goods/services paid as consideration up to ₹50 LakhLawspet, Puducherry
SCDRC Puducherry₹50 Lakh to ₹2 Crore; also first appeals from DCDRC ordersLawspet, Puducherry
NCDRCAbove ₹2 Crore; also first appeals from SCDRC ordersNew Delhi

(Section 34(1)/47(1)(a)(i)/58(1)(a)(i) of the Act itself set these thresholds at ₹1 Crore / ₹10 Crore / above ₹10 Crore; each carries a proviso letting the Central Government prescribe a different value. Exercising that power, the Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission) Rules, 2021 currently set the values shown in the table above.) A Puducherry traveller may generally file at DCDRC Puducherry under Section 34(2), regardless of where the airline, hotel, or OTA is based, or where the flight/stay took place.

Limitation Period

Under Section 69, CPA 2019, a complaint must ordinarily be filed within two years from the date the cause of action arose — the date of the flight cancellation/denied boarding, or the date the hotel/OTA refused a valid refund request.

Documents Typically Needed

General Process Outline

  1. Step 1 — Airline/hotel/OTA grievance: Raise the complaint in writing with the airline's/hotel's/OTA's customer care and Grievance Officer (for the OTA), retaining all correspondence.
  2. Step 2 — DGCA AirSewa (for flights): A complaint may be filed on airsewa.gov.in for regulatory escalation regarding DGCA-mandated obligations.
  3. Step 3 — Legal notice: A written notice to the relevant party setting out the grievance and relief sought.
  4. Step 4 — File the complaint: Under Section 35, with supporting documents and affidavit, at DCDRC Puducherry, online via e-jagriti.gov.in or in person.
  5. Step 5 — Admission and hearing: Per Section 36 (admission, ordinarily within 21 days of filing) and Section 38 (notice to the opposite party within 21 days of admission; response within 30 days, extendable by 15 days), then hearing and evidence.
  6. Step 6 — Order: Under Section 39, the Commission may direct relief it considers appropriate on the facts proved, including the DGCA-mandated compensation where applicable; the Act does not fix or guarantee any specific outcome beyond what the applicable rule itself prescribes.

Firm Information & Disclaimer

SG Law Associates — Adv. Ganesh Shriram G R, Consumer Court Advocate, Puducherry. Office: No.86, Convent Street, Nellithope, Puducherry – 605005, India.

This page is published for general legal education and information only and does not constitute advertising or solicitation of legal work under the Bar Council of India Rules and the Advocates Act, 1961. It does not constitute legal advice, and no advocate-client relationship is created by browsing this page or sending an enquiry. Outcomes in any consumer dispute depend on the specific facts, evidence, and the Commission's discretion; nothing on this page guarantees a particular result, refund, or compensation amount. See the full Disclaimer.